Many would like to be able to scale the UI to less than 2x like 1.5x or 1.25x so more area would be available for images or Adobe UI will fit on smaller displays like the surface pro 3 2160x1440 display at 2x UI that becomes a 1080x720 display and Photoshop UI requires at least 1024x768, 1080x720 does not meet that requirement.Click to expand.In OS X System Preferences, what happens when you choose "Default for Display" instead of a Scaled Resolution? What resolution do you get? What is the diagonal size of your new monitor (in inches)? However many of the pixels have bee allocated as UI pixels so the display area for image has been greatly reduced. While Photoshop display you image on a high resolution display the is 3840x2160 pixels. Adobe 2x UI lets you use your new high resolution display liker two displays a 1920x1080 display for its UI the display at 1/2 resolution four native pixels are user to make a single UI pixel so the display like on old low resolution displays with half the resolution. The display you purchased you got what you paid for. You now have 3840x2160pixels twice the resolution. So what is displayed of course is 1/4 the size that would be displayed on older displays that displayed larger size pixels. The UI Issue is a result of the display's high resolution the display displays much smaller pixels than older displays four time as many pixels in the same area so four times the information is displayed in the same area. Did you read any user reviews before you did. I believe it was your choice to buy a 4k display. If only I could run opensource painting program Krita without crashing I would have stopped paying for CC a long time ago. I am awaiting a more streamlined solution for this than filling up my windows with unnecessary dead space that is the experimental 2X size option. I'm 25, and I can't read the font because it's so small in the default, nonexperimental view. Why is this not fixed yet? It's a major gripe for me. I have been browsing topics like these and see they go back to 2010. However now my painting area is about 50% of the screen size, so it's far from ideal, indeed I will continue to choose to work on a different computer when I can. Here is a picture of my 280x1620 monitor (sony vaio bought for use with photoshop) It's a touch screen so naturally I have not been able to use it what so ever, my finger is 12 times as large as the icons, and the pen is too inaccurate to successfully hit the little tags in the gradient selector (i hit 1 in 30 times) I have now enabled the experimental 2X ui feature and i think it is marginally more productive. The display does not meet Photoshop Requirements so Photoshop UI does not fit on screen, A Surface Pro 3 screen 2160x1440 becomes a 1080x720 close to the required 1024x768 just 48 pixel short in height. When you use Photoshop on it and use the 2x preference its equivalent of running Photoshop on a machine with ad display with 960x540 pixels. If you look at the above append you would see the a machine like Microsoft Surface Pro 2 which has a high resolution 1920x180 pixels. Displays with less the 2056x1536 pixels do not meet Photoshop requirement when run at half resolution. While the current patch may be OK for laptop and tablets with high resolution 4K displays it does not actually work well for Laptop and Tablets that have high resolution displays that are not 4K tablets. This experimental 2x UI is a case where Adobe realizes when something does not work I have confidences Adobe and Microsoft will come up with a solution. Adobe's programming staff is outstanding they can fix them. While Photoshop is the best game in town I would still like to see bugs fixed. I am a big fan of Photoshop and have also been very critical of Adobe support sill Adobe recognized me. Its nice to know the Adobe appreciates user that help their users and also does not censor forums but for inappropriate content.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |